Understanding Zirconia and Emax: The Materials Behind Dental Restorations

The reparation of teeth, which involves the use of prosthetic devices such as veneers, bridges and crowns is an essential aspect of dental care. It serves to reinstate both functionality and aesthetic appeal that may have been lost due to damage or decay in teeth. The longevity and performance capabilities for these restorations weigh heavily on the decision made regarding materials used by patients along with dental practitioners alike – hence highlighting its importance towards patient satisfaction.

Two of the most favored substances for dental restorations are Emax and zirconia. Each one comes with its own set of benefits and drawbacks that must be considered to decide which substance is best suited for your particular case. Being well-versed in these materials can help you make informed judgments about how to proceed with your oral care options.

Zirconia stands as a sturdy and enduring ceramic substance that exhibits biocompatibility with human anatomy. The material displays exceptional endurance against abrasion, hence its suitability for dental restorations lasting well into the future. Moreover, zirconia’s aesthetic qualities are highly desirable due to its ability to be shaded and polished so it can blend seamlessly with nearby teeth of varying shades.

On the opposite end, Emax is a variant of lithium disilicate ceramic celebrated for its impressive strength and ability to let light through. This renders it an excellent choice when aiming to replicate the visual effect of actual teeth during restorations. Moreover, Emax’s resilience regarding fractures or cracks surpasses that found in conventional ceramics; subsequently making it a prime candidate for mending high-pressure areas within one’s mouth.

When considering a restoration made from either Zirconia or Emax, it is important to consider the specific needs and goals of the patient. For example, if the restoration is in a highly visible area and aesthetics are a priority, Emax may be a better option. If strength and durability are more important, Zirconia may be the better choice.

In the end, selecting which material to use relies on different factors such as where and how it will be used for restoration, patient’s preference in aesthetics, and advice from dentists. Comprehending the pros and cons of Zirconia or Emax materials would give patients insightful decision-making skills when receiving dental treatment that is suitable for their requirements.